The Works Of David The King David - 1706 Words

Throughout the history there has been major events that occurred which left an impact for generations. A major history that was recorded in the bible was â€Å"King David†; base on our understanding of history David was once just a normal shepherd until King Saul the former ruler of Israel appointed him as the new air to the throne. In the present year David is known as the slayer of Goliath killing him with stones he put in his sling and cutting of his head. This event was printed as a biblical history because it is said that before he became King, â€Å"God gave Saul the position to become the first emperor of Israel, but after disobeying god’s words he was rejected from the throne† . David became the symbol of Florence, many artists have done sculptures of him and two of the best artists were Michelangelo and Bernini. These two were talented of creating sculptures inspiration of David; although the subjects are the same their style of sculpting is different. T here were other artist whose done sculpture of David, but by far these two were the best, in my opinion. â€Å"Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Simoni†, was born in the 15 century the time of the â€Å"High Renaissance†, he was announced â€Å"the greatest artist in his time† . When he was only 12 years old â€Å"Michelangelo was sent to study at Florence and became an apprentice under Ghirlandaio† . Michelangelo was born in a religious family; most of his artwork is based on the legends of how humanity was created and Christ. He alsoShow MoreRelatedReligion995 Words   |  4 PagesJothams fable, trees try to decude who will be king, the olive, fid and grape vine decline as they will have good work to do, only the bramble wants to be the king, purseus it with force. Jephthah For Gilead, operates in the Transjordan against the Ammonites- contract that if successful then we will be made a ruler After success in battle to, promises to sacrifice first person to come out of house- clearly implies human sacrifice- ends up sacrificing daughter (study of heroic faith) Samson Read MoreBibl 105 Essay 2978 Words   |  4 Pagespromises to provide. During the time of Solomon the people of Israel lacked obedience. God as king was no longer good enough. Israel’s lack of obedience caused them to anoint a king that also lacked faith in the Lord. Man is broken and even great leaders have flaws. Israel’s demand for a king ultimately resulted in the division of the kingdom. During the time of Samuel, the people of Israel desire a king. God had promised to provide for the Israelites and in return God asked for obedience and loveRead MoreThe Reign Of King David1503 Words   |  7 PagesThe reign of King David is divided into two parts: his reign over Judah and his reign over all of Israel. During King David’s reign, two sides of him are revealed, his successful side as a leader and his bitter, sinful side. King David can be viewed and understood as a great man, but also a terrible man. It is difficult to draw a clear conclusion about his character. This essay delves into both the positive and negative sides of David, to gain a good understanding of who he was as a king and a man.Read MoreThe Man After God s Own Heart898 Words   |  4 PagesDavid was the last son of Jesse, ancestor to Jesus Christ and the second King of Israel. He was considered as a â€Å"Man after God’s own heart†. From a shepherd boy to a warrior, and from a warr ior to a King, he lived his life the best he could for the Lord. Through the battles he fought, and the wars he was victorious in, he could’ve ended up in pride considering how great and mighty a King he was. In-spite of his successes in battle, he was known to be a man of humility. David wasn’t perfect; he sinnedRead MoreThe Rule Of The King898 Words   |  4 PagesAfter the failure of the Judges, â€Å"Israel desired a king, so they could be like all other nations.† (1Sam 5:8 paraphrased) Creating a United Monarchy meant many changes would have to take place. At the time Israel had been theocracy and God was their King, however the elders had a different plan. They wanted a king, even if it meant rejecting God. God told Samuel to listen to the people, appoint them a king, but make sure they understand what the king who reigns over them will do Samuel explained toRead MoreThe Day Of Israel The Kings Ruled By The Favor And Choice Of God995 Words   |  4 Page s During the time of Israel the kings ruled by the favor and choice of God. Before that time the people political affairs were judged and taken care of by God through the prophets he assigned .The Prophets heard directly from God and delivered the message of God. The last administrative prophet the people had was Samuel. The people of Israel however were not happy there were no more comfortable with God overseeing there affairs they wanted man to do that for them the bible says that they wanted toRead MoreThe Friendship Of David And Jonathan1275 Words   |  6 Pages Saul’s son Jonathan found great favor in David. Jonathan grew to love David, and helped protect him from Saul’s wrath. The friendship of David and Jonathan was the effect of divine grace, which produces in true believers one heart and one soul, and causes them to love each other (Henry, 2000). It is possible to love other people even if a parent has hatred in their hearts towards them. When Jonathan cou ld not stop Saul’s march toward evil, he could warn the intended victim, thus averting aRead More David And Solomon Essay1069 Words   |  5 Pages David and Solomon King David proved to be a wise and effective leader for Israel. However, it can be said that his son, Solomon, made several mistakes during his reign. Many of his problems originated from his Temple, a stucture that was conceptualized by his father to be a deterrent against the paganism, which infested the land. Yet, it seemed as if several of Solomon’s policies actually encouraged paganism rather than deter it. King David, a member of the tribe of Judah was chosen by God toRead MoreExplain The Difference Between Reading The Bible Confessionally And Critical939 Words   |  4 Pagesself-reflection. 2. Explain the three big â€Å"T† obstacles a reader faces to accessing the â€Å"original† words of the Bible. The obstacles a reader faces when accessing the â€Å"original† words of the Bible are: †¢ Translation- is an obstacle because the original works are in Hebrew or Arabic which requires people who are expert in these fields to interpret it correctly. †¢ Text – is an obstacle because of the reliability of how the documents written, transmitted and collected into a text because the bible is madeRead MoreThe Presence of God In People Essay1178 Words   |  5 PagesBecoming Intimate with the King When His people cry out to Him with pure hearts, when they sing joyfully about his goodness and grace, when they sit quietly and wait to hear from Him in the midst of their busy day, God shows up -Michael W. Smith (Worship 9). While there are so many signs that the presence of God is in a place, it is sometimes easy to miss becoming intimate with him in that moment. How can a person become intimate with God in that moment? How can a person touch God? How can they

Spiritual Belief A World Split Apart Free Essays

Rico Spears Ms. Lisle 9/26/12 Academic Writing and Research Spiritual Belief In this analysis paper I will talk about incorporating God throughout everyday life, whether it be through materialistic things or one’s own self perception of how it is to live and pattern after Godly ways . In â€Å"A World Split Apart,† Alexander Solzhenitsyn infers that there is a higher power than man; a lack of spirituality can harm ones afterlife. We will write a custom essay sample on Spiritual Belief: A World Split Apart or any similar topic only for you Order Now Through a higher power all things are possible he says, â€Å"If, as claimed by humanism, man were born only to be happy, he would not be born to die. Since his body is doomed to death, his task on earth evidently must be more spiritual: not a total engrossment in everyday life, not the search for the best ways to obtain material goods and then their carefree consumption. † Whereas in â€Å"A Voice from Russia’s Past,† by Jack Fruchtman Jr. he simply argues that Solzhenitsyn is speaking from Slavophiles point of view, which stands as a group of Russian philologists and nationalists interested in the origins of the Russian language. Fruchtman also stated that Solzhenitsyn echoed this theme at Harvard when he noted that the philosophical foundation of the West has historically rested on a â€Å"rationalistic humanism,† by which he meant â€Å"the proclaimed and enforced autonomy of man from any higher force above him. (Fruchtman 44)† My last and final source will come from â€Å"Presenting Humanism† by Jende Huang. Huang speaks from a humanist view and states that our society has been so socialized to accept the idea that believing in God is something that is â€Å"good,† and even for a religious liberal, there may exist, an unconscious desire to hold onto that. The realization that you don’t need a god to live your life is a difficult one and one that cannot be easily acknowledged. Solzhenitsyn and Huang share some of the same spiritual beliefs when referring to man. Huang states that man was created to be â€Å"God like† and to pattern ways after God. Speaking from a humanist point of view Huang says, â€Å"ideally, humanist are continually open to new ideas and new information, nd refuse to be shackled by beliefs that remain outside the realm of testability,† (Huang 1-3); he proves this by stating humanism is analogous to science in the sense that both are concerned not only with the body of knowledge and the evidence that supports it, but with efficient means and methods used to gain knowledge. Is it right that man’s life and society’s activities are ruled by material expansion above all? Solzhenitsyn asks this question in reference to government. Laws are put in place to abide by but there is always a loop hole in any law system. Laws are to protect the rights of others or for humans as one body to abide by. Through all the materialistic abuse of power used by some government officials, Solzhenitsyn tends to acknowledge that even in the era that he is in, man is still the head. Life after death, as he talks about spirituality, should be better than your life on earth. Even Huang states that if you accept the bible as truth, you’re agreeing that God would spread his message to pre-agricultural nomads who couldn’t even imagine the evaluation of human society over the subsequent thousands of years. Understanding that you don’t need God to live your everyday life, Huang says, humans still do things to show representation that he is a factor in life such as: going to church and taking communion; â€Å" Do this as often as you remember me† 1st Corinthians 11:25 (NKJ). Man is not perfect but by following the bible he can reach salvation and become cleansed through baptism and understanding that each day you can become more â€Å"God like. James Reston who wrote â€Å"A Russian at Harvard† states that Solzhenitsyn is right in many cases but contradicts the demeanor of his message a lot. Solzhenitsyn entitles his address â€Å"A World Split Apart† why so Reston questions the diverse message in each passage to say it sounds like a â€Å"mind split apart† (Reston pg. 37). Reston says that Solzhenitsyn was right to complain about that â€Å"hastiness and superficiality are the psychic disease of the Twentieth Century† (Reston pg. 38); in refere nce to the war period and the lack of spiritual belief. After the suffering of decades of violence and oppression, the human soul longs for things higher, warmer and purer than those offered by today’s mass living habits, introduced by the revolting invasion of publicity, by TV stupor and by intolerable music†,(Solzhenitsyn pg. 14) Solzhenitsyn writes this statement proving all points to the lacking of â€Å"spiritual being† stated by him. Ending his speech, Solzhenitsyn speaks about a higher power. In Philippians 4:13 it says, â€Å"I can do all things through Christ (God) which strengthen me† (NKJ). Solzhenitsyn asks â€Å"Is it true that man is above everything? Is there no superior spirit above him? Is it right that man’s life and society’s activities should be ruled by material expansion above all? Is it permissible to promote such expansion to the detriment of our integral spiritual life? †(Solzhenitsyn pg. 21) What is life or even afterlife? In contrast with that similar understanding Fruchtman attacks by still having Solzhenitsyn, in a Slavophile voice he states that Solzhenitsyn and the Slavophiles believe that this decline and everything accompanying it was deeply rooted in Western history, a history of man, where man has lost his spiritual tie to the infinite, the eternal, and the timeless( Fruchtman pg. 45). The Slavophile Ivan Kiereevsky wrote, â€Å" it is painful to see what a subtle, but inevitable and just-sent madness now drives the Western man. He feels his darkness and like a moth, he flies into the fire, which he takes to be the sun. He cries like a frog and barks like a dog, when he hears the word of God. †(Fruchtman pg. 45) Man, in short, is no longer human, and the decline of the West is upon us. Fruchtman attests his point later on in his response when he references how Solzhenitsyn says it is a society which is doomed because of its rejection of spirituality and its concomitant worship of reason and material things. Because the West had a tremendous fall in spirituality, Solzhenitsyn began to question, in order to get out the state that the West is in, who does man look up? During the time of the speech men were dominant in the sense of being superior to women, but if â€Å"lost† in sense of spirituality and begin to believe that modern ways and material things are more important than being God like. Is it actually true that man is everything and neither that nor anyone is superior to him? â€Å"We turned our backs upon the Spirit,† Mr. Solzhenitsyn proclaimed, â€Å"and embraced all that is material with excessive and unwarranted zeal,† (Pg. 4). Fruchtman stated, for the Slavophiles, the West was decadent primarily because it had adopted the worship of rationality, matter and form. Moreover, it relied too much on legalistic systems of thought and action. This particular statement reflects Solzhenitsyn outlook on one’s self; Solzhenitsyn supports this statement when h e stated that only by the voluntary nurturing in ourselves of freely accepted and serene self-restraint can mankind rise above a world stream of materialism. (pg. 20-21) Solzhenitsyn infers that no one on earth has any way left but upward climbing to the next anthropological stage (Pg. 1). Anthropological is the study of humanity, social action between humans and cultural as well as religious preferences. Fruchtman goes on to say for both Mr. Solzhenitsyn and the Slavophiles, men spiritual capacities have become subverted by the overpowering influences of reason and legality. Solzhenitsyn, Fruchtman, and Huang share similar beliefs when referring to man and higher powers above man. To pattern after God means to be â€Å"God like† as Huang states while Fruchtman counters Solzhenitsyn by saying he is speaking from a Slavophiles point of view. The West, as Solzhenitsyn portrays it is one who now has a lack of spiritual belief. The West, they argued, had emphasized rationality, compulsion and above all legalistic institutions and material wellbeing. Each of these qualities was in conflict with man’s inherent, goodness and virtue, Fruchtman writes. This statement proves his thought on how Solzhenitsyn is continually speaking and analyzing from his own humanistic view. As Solzhenitsyn states, â€Å"It will demand from us a spiritual blaze† (pg. 21). He infers to the west as whole and not singling any particular individual out; to act as one mind body and soul, but in government form. Laws are set in place to help us not hinder as a result he entitles this particular section â€Å"Before the Turn†. Still the question lies is there no superior spirit above man? If so how can we be more like him, how can we incorporate that higher power in our everyday life and in our law and judicial systems? How can take eyes off the moral standards of man and out them on the mindset for man to pattern after â€Å"God like† ways? How to cite Spiritual Belief: A World Split Apart, Papers

Comparison Essay free essay sample

Sharlene, the sixteen year old girl, decides that she does not want to go to university as her father intends, she wants to leave and travel. But she has not worked up the courage to tell her father. When all of a sudden her brother comes home for a visit and tells her father that he is dropping out of school. The second short story â€Å"The Charmer† written by Budge Wilson is about a charming young boy who can charm his way through, Winnifred, his little sister claims he is â€Å"Enchanted†. He has grown up to be the same old charmer with expectations from his family and most certainly his father. Parental expectations always follow the eldest sibling; it’s the person who chooses whether or not to exceed them. In both short stories, the father is the one building the expectations. The eldest sibling who are the brothers, Zachary and Greg, both fail to reach their fathers expectations for them. One of the different things that the poems both have is there rhyme scheme. Although there Is not many differences that the poems have this is one of them. The rhyme scheme for the raven is abaca, while the rhyme scheme for Enable Lee Is abbacy.This Is Just nee of the ways that the poems are different. Both of the poems have a similar theme though. Both of the poems talk about how someone was taken from them. The raven describes how he mourns for the lost one and Enable Lee talks about how nothing can ever truly take her away from him. The poem Enable Lee Is telling Its readers that no matter what anyone tries to do they will never break his love for her. They can take her from him but he will always love her and be there for her. The tone in Enable Lee Is slightly different from the tone In the Raven.Although It Is still closely elated; the difference Is that the Raven has a sad tone all the way through It and Enable Lee has a sad but Joyous tone In It at the same time. It has a sad tone that they took her from him, but the Joyous Is for being with Enable Lee and being able to have her In his heart. The Raven describes how his soul seems to be lost and a raven Is constantly trying to come and get It. The raven Is always knocking on the door and saying nevermore. These two poems that were written by the same author are closely related even though they were about different people.This particular toe, so far for all the poems I have ever read by him seem to be sad and about losing someone. These two poems only prove my point even further, he Is a good poet. He Is also an author of horror stories and novels. These poems are both very good. Comparison Essay By validate different things that the poems both have is there rhyme scheme. Although there is the raven is abaca, while the rhyme scheme for Enable Lee is abbacy. This is Just can ever truly take her away from him. The poem Enable Lee is telling its readers Enable Lee is slightly different from the tone in the Raven.Although it is still closely related; the difference is that the Raven has a sad tone all the way through it and Enable Lee has a sad but Joyous tone in it at the same time. It has a sad tone that they took her from him, but the Joyous is for being with Enable Lee and being able to have her in his heart. The Raven describes how his soul seems to be lost and a raven is constantly trying to come and get it. The raven is always knocking on the losing someone. These two poems only prove my point even further, he is a good poet. He is also an author of horror stories and novels.